High-risk checklist

EU AI Act High-Risk Checklist

Use this checklist when an AI feature may affect safety, rights, eligibility, access, employment, education, public services, law enforcement, migration, courts, or democratic processes.

Disclaimer: This checklist is a practical starting point for internal review. It is not legal advice and does not determine your final regulatory classification.

Step 1: classify the use case

QuestionWhat to record
What is the intended purpose?Write the product task, user group, decision context, and expected output.
Is the system a safety component?Check whether it is part of a regulated product or safety-related workflow.
Does it match an Annex III area?Screen employment, education, essential services, biometrics, public services, law enforcement, migration, courts, and democratic processes.
Does it make or influence consequential decisions?Note whether people can lose access, ranking, opportunity, services, money, or rights.
Can a human meaningfully review the output?Describe the reviewer role, override path, escalation rule, and timing.

Step 2: prepare the evidence file

Step 3: decide the launch lane

ResultRecommended product action
No high-risk signalKeep a dated classification memo and still check transparency obligations.
Possible Annex III signalPause self-serve launch, gather evidence, and ask for specialist review.
Clear high-impact decision supportBuild human oversight, documentation, monitoring, and customer controls before release.
Prohibited-practice signalStop the use case and redesign before testing with real users.

Use the documentation template

Official sources

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026.

Updated review note

Review and responsible-use note

EU AI Act High-Risk Checklist is maintained as a practical page for AI compliance self-assessment. Use the result to organize internal review, collect evidence, and decide when a qualified legal or compliance specialist should review the system.

Scope

What this page is for

It helps users produce a concrete artifact, checklist, or decision note instead of only reading generic advice. The page is written for people comparing options and preparing a real workflow.

Limit

What it does not replace

These tools provide operational checklists and first-pass triage, not legal advice, certification, or a guarantee of EU AI Act compliance.

Practical value note

How this page supports the site

EU AI Act High-Risk Checklist gives visitors context about AI Compliance Kit, the workflow boundaries, and how the site's AI compliance review pages should be used. It supports trust by explaining purpose, limitations, contact paths, and review expectations.

Audience

Who this is for

EU AI Act High-Risk Checklist is written for founders, product owners, compliance teams, and operators preparing AI systems for review. It assumes the visitor wants to complete a practical task, not browse a decorative landing page.

Output

What to save

The useful result should be a checklist, report, policy draft, questionnaire, or review note that can be copied, downloaded, printed, compared, or used as a next-step working document.

Review

What to check

The output is an operational preparation aid. It should be reviewed against the actual system, data flow, jurisdiction, and qualified legal or compliance advice before production use. Keep the original source material and record the assumptions used for the generated result.

Use this page to understand the site before relying on any generated output or publishing a changed file, policy, or technical configuration. If the result affects a public page, customer-facing workflow, policy decision, or uploaded file, review one sample manually before repeating the workflow in bulk.