Classify the use case
Identify high-risk signals across employment, education, credit, biometric, critical infrastructure, healthcare, and public-sector use cases.
EU AI Act self-assessment
Find your AI risk level before it becomes a launch blocker. A practical classifier for builders, SaaS teams, agencies, and small businesses that need first-pass EU AI Act risk triage without reading hundreds of pages of legal text.
Most small teams do not need a 90-page report on day one. They need a clear signal: what kind of AI system are we building, what could trigger high-risk obligations, and what should we document next?
Identify high-risk signals across employment, education, credit, biometric, critical infrastructure, healthcare, and public-sector use cases.
Turn the result into a practical next-step checklist covering transparency, human oversight, logging, data governance, and specialist review.
The tool is supported by explanatory guides, templates, source links, and clear disclaimers so the site is built around clear user workflows.
This site is built around practical artifacts: inventories, risk snapshots, policies, disclosures, vendor questionnaires, literacy plans, and reports that teams can save.
Generate a step-by-step review path across inventory, risk, policy, disclosure, vendor review, and literacy evidence.
Create an AI system inventory with owners, vendors, data types, risk signals, missing evidence, CSV, and reports.
A rules-based self-assessment for AI teams that need initial risk triage.
Generate AI transparency notices, HTML banners, and compliance-file notes.
Generate procurement questions, red flags, evidence requests, CSV, and review reports.
Draft an internal AI acceptable use policy for approved tools, data boundaries, human review, and incidents.
Create role-based AI literacy modules, evidence records, CSV schedules, and printable reports.
A practical screening guide for use cases that may need to stop before launch.
When chatbots, assistants, and generated content need clear user notices.
A launch-readiness checklist for consequential AI systems.
A starter notice for chatbots, assistants, and generative AI features.
A compact file structure for intended purpose, oversight, risk controls, and review notes.
A plain-English guide to the categories that deserve deeper review.
Key dates and practical planning checkpoints for 2026.
Scope signals for non-EU teams selling, deploying, or processing AI outputs in Europe.
Scenario pages turn one broad compliance topic into focused search entries for chatbots, hiring tools, generative media, healthcare AI, education scoring, credit review, biometrics, and workplace monitoring.
Updated review note
AI Compliance Kit is maintained as a practical page for AI compliance self-assessment. Use the result to organize internal review, collect evidence, and decide when a qualified legal or compliance specialist should review the system.
It helps users produce a concrete artifact, checklist, or decision note instead of only reading generic advice. The page is written for people comparing options and preparing a real workflow.
These tools provide operational checklists and first-pass triage, not legal advice, certification, or a guarantee of EU AI Act compliance.
The highest-risk scenarios on this site are framed as compliance reviews, not as instructions to build or deploy sensitive AI systems. Useful references include EU AI Act official text and European Commission AI Act overview.
Practical value note
AI Compliance Kit gives visitors context about AI Compliance Kit, the workflow boundaries, and how the site's AI compliance review pages should be used. It supports trust by explaining purpose, limitations, contact paths, and review expectations.
AI Compliance Kit is written for founders, product owners, compliance teams, and operators preparing AI systems for review. It assumes the visitor wants to complete a practical task, not browse a decorative landing page.
The useful result should be a checklist, report, policy draft, questionnaire, or review note that can be copied, downloaded, printed, compared, or used as a next-step working document.
The output is an operational preparation aid. It should be reviewed against the actual system, data flow, jurisdiction, and qualified legal or compliance advice before production use. Keep the original source material and record the assumptions used for the generated result.
Use this page to understand the site before relying on any generated output or publishing a changed file, policy, or technical configuration. If the result affects a public page, customer-facing workflow, policy decision, or uploaded file, review one sample manually before repeating the workflow in bulk.